Another soapbox rant from les archives d'une femme.
Apologies if this rambles and is a bit of a rant. It's a topic that's close to my heart, having lived it for most of my life.
Tish at A Femme d'un Certain Age kicked off a lively discussion last week with these two posts, and then Duchesse at Passage des Perles followed up with some thoughts of her own.
I'll admit to carrying more than a bit of baggage of my own on this topic, having been a stocky kid in a fat-phobic family, and having spent the years from my early teens through my twenties living with eating disorders of varying degrees of severity. I started dieting at age 13 and a weight of about 103 lbs. because I thought I should be as thin as Twiggy, the models in Seventeen magazine and the actresses on TV, and no one around me discouraged that belief. My mother had her own weight issues/insecurities, and my father had inherited from his family certain WASP-y hangups about weight and food (excess weight is indicative of Lack of Character and lower social class, and acknowledging physical hunger Is. Not. Done.) So no, I'm not neutral here.
Obession with weight and food is a life-stealer. At worst, it can cause disease and death. At best, it makes one's world increasingly narrow. I'm certain that my strenuous dieting (and periods of anorexia) at such an early age stunted my physical growth, and certainly shifted my focus away from my potential place in the broader world back into a circular obsession with pounds and calories. (In fact, this narrowing of focus is well documented among people experiencing starvation. At the time, I thought it was only further proof of my "weakness" and "lack of character.")
While I do think that young women of today are more aware and media-savvy than I was, I still have to wonder about the damage being done to young bodies and psyches when a single, narrow standard of physical beauty or even just acceptability is promoted. But it seems that anytime there's a discussion of increasingly skeletal models or attempts to show attractively presented women above a size 4, the chorus invariabley chimes in, 3, 2, 1...But What About Obesity?? So much worse!™
I've seen other articles/studies that back up the quote that Duchesse posted, stating that girls who diet are more likely to be heavy later on. Would my weight be lower today had I not spent years starving myself, periodically bingeing and eating far less less healthfully than if I'd never had an eating disorder? Without a time machine and the ability to rewrite history, I'll never know. But I do know that I wasted far too much mental and physical energy on trying to achieve a size/shape that just isn't realistic for me and never was.
Nancy in comments on Duchesse's post said: One of the things that really annoys me is when weight is presented as a dichotomy: either extreme of thinness or obesity. There is a middle ground; it's where most of us should live, and it's ok! Yes!! I'm annoyed by this too (see "3,2,1" above)! The vast majority of us fall somewhere in between skeletal and obese. Presenting only uber-thin images of women is doing nothing to stem increasing obesity among the general population, and I'd argue that it's actually accelerating it, by encouraging women and even young girls who are not overweight by any stretch of the imagination to diet and wreck their metabolisms and set themselves up for years of eating disorders and higher weights. As Duchesse pointed out in comments over at A Femme, it's hardly "promoting obesity" to present a few isolated images of larger women, when 99.9% of the time, only the thinnest and youngest are presented as "aspirational." But why can't we see images of beautiful clothing modeled on women who are size 8, 10, 12, 16? Who are older than teenagers? Why does "aspirational" have to mean "impossible for 95% of us?" Street style blogs used to be an alternative, but now even they seem to focus on either the young and very slender, or the fashion industry insiders.
The result of this, (and I'm in agreement with Duchesse here) is that it's skewed our perception of what's "fat" vs. what's normal and healthy (hint: a wide variety of sizes, due in no small part to genetics). I'm the first person to say that not enough people here in the US are eating healthfully or being optimally active, but a healthy diet of real food in moderate portions and daily activity do not always result in a culturally sanctioned physique. I've personally known women who devote much time and energy (agonizing over the precise number of points in a salad, spending hours daily at the gym) trying to achieve a body that has no basis in their own genetic reality, to the degree that the rest of their lives get short shrift, while being applauded by their peers for their "discipline." I find this disturbing and sad.
I'm also admittedly thin-skinned about the moralizing subtext that seems to tag along whenever weight is discussed, having been ingrained as a child with the belief that my non-slender build was somehow a moral failing (despite eating the same food as the rest of my family, fixed and portioned by my mother). So the needle on my Sanctimony Meter shoots over into the red zone when I hear or read people stating we should stop complaining, that super skinny images of women in media should "motivate" us to "push the plate away" and "get up off the couch and get some exercise." Or "if you'd just do xyz you'd achieve 4% body fat just like I did!"
Marketers claim that we don't want to see images of women who are size 12 or 65 years old, that it doesn't sell products. I'd disagree with the first part of that statement, but probably agree with the second part, which is really their motivation. People who feel insecure are more likely to spend on products that promise to fix them. (Sal at Already Pretty addresses this beautifully here.) Some women have stopped looking at fashion magazines, stopped watching television, removed themselves from those impossible images. And if you want to do that, fine. But visual media do have an impact on our culture, or advertisers wouldn't pay the billions annually that they do to present their products. I've come to believe that cutting ourselves off from our culture isn't the answer, raising our voices to change it is (even if it's writing letters to CEO's you know will never be read, or impotent bloggy ranting). And keep teaching our kids media literacy, so they learn to question and deconstruct the images they're presented, and ask "who profits?"
Summary: Life is short. Eat real food, move around whenever you can in ways that you enjoy, and re-evaluate your beliefs and values periodically to be sure they're serving you. Question and discard those that aren't. In the end, a little roll of fat around the middle doesn't say anything about the kind of person you are or how much you loved and were loved.
~
Monday, July 30, 2012
Encore: Weighing In On Les Rondes
Labels:
Encore,
Waxing Philosophical,
Weight
| Reactions: |
Fashion Flash!
Fashion Flash is Live over at The Glam Gals (Fabulous After 40)!
Some of this week's topics include:
- A must-have makeup organizer
- Retin-A
- This season's bright pink and red, and how to wear them
- Lots more, go see!
~
Sunday, July 29, 2012
Bowls.
Our ragtag cadre of cereal/fruit bowls had been reduced by attrition (breakage) over the last few years to a lonely cohort of two rooster-adorned stalwarts, purchased at TJ Maxx sometime last decade. Yesterday I set out to replenish the ranks, and dropped by Macy's where a home sale was in progress. This ersatz found-at-a-brocante pattern tugged at my heartstrings, so came home with six of them.
~
Labels:
Domestic,
Housekeeping
| Reactions: |
Friday, July 27, 2012
Fashion Flashback
![]() |
L'Agence colorblock coat |
I had a jacket almost Exactly Like This back in the very late 80's. I kid you not. Mine was from the Spiegel catalog, though.
~
Thursday, July 26, 2012
Variation On A Theme
Jacket: Eileen Fisher from 2010.
Pants: NYDJ, here. To borrow a Faux Fuchsia-ism, I Luff Them 11/10.
Boots: Fluevog, here. (mine were purchased in 2009 in Vancouver, on a wonderful shopping afternoon with materfamilias.)
Earrings: Lauren by Ralph Lauren. Similar here, mine are silver.
Yes, it was actually cool enough in July to wear this.
~
| Reactions: |
Wednesday, July 25, 2012
Bad Boys of Summer
Bad Boys: They charmed their way into our wardrobes, but sister, they done us wrong.
Bad Boys Part 1 here.
Bad Boys Part 2 here.
The Cheap S.O.B.*
![]() |
| Source |
*h/t to Patti at Not Dead Yet Style for the reminder about this BB.
Outward Bound
![]() |
| Source |
The Heel
![]() |
| "My friends call me Jimmy." Source |
Walk of Shame
![]() |
| Source |
How are you doing with ferreting out and sending your Bad Boys packing?
~
Labels:
Bad Fashion,
Dresses,
Shoes,
Style
| Reactions: |
Monday, July 23, 2012
Repost: Following The Prime Directive
Between now and mid-August, I'm giving myself a bit of a break on the blogging schedule. I'll still be writing new posts a couple of times per week or as inspiration strikes, but I'll also be re-posting some of my favorites from the past few years for your (I hope) enjoyment.
Even as a child I was a fan of science fiction, and especially loved the TV show Star Trek. In that program, the one overriding guiding principle of Star Fleet and the Federation of Planets was known as the Prime Directive. (While this concept could be a bit fluid at times depending on plot points, it was consistently referred to throughout all of the various Star Trek franchises.)
So what does a policy of non-interference in alien civilizations have to do with style? Not much, except that it was the first and most important rule from which all others flowed. Many of us have our own Prime Directive when it comes to our conscious and unconscious style rules. Some examples of a Style PD might be:
![]() |
| Lt. Uhura rocked that uniform like no one else. Cool earrings too! |
So what does a policy of non-interference in alien civilizations have to do with style? Not much, except that it was the first and most important rule from which all others flowed. Many of us have our own Prime Directive when it comes to our conscious and unconscious style rules. Some examples of a Style PD might be:
- To look thinner
- To look younger
- To look more sophisticated
- To project a specific image at work
- To look sexy
- To look pretty
- To look rich
- To be on the cutting edge of fashion
- To declare disdain for convention
- To wear only timeless classics
- To signal one's allegiance to a philosophy, activity or social group (think Goth, Preppy, sports team jerseys, local norms, religious traditions)
- To be comfortable
Nothing inherently wrong with any of these, and one's Style PD might shift and change from time to time, or be a blend of any of the above. But adhering to a particular primary rule year in and year out without ever re-examining whether that objective is still what's most important to us can close off some avenues of self-expression through style.
I've written before that I was a chubby child in a very weight-conscious family. "Thou shalt wear only what is Slimming," was the Style PD I was handed as a catechism. That included no tucked shirts, nothing in bright colors, no pleated skirts, no horizontal stripes. And for decades I hewed uncritically to those rules, with "Slimming" as my clothing mantra. But in recent years, I've found that sometimes ignoring my Prime Directive allowed me to find and wear pieces that I loved and felt best expressed my inner self, even though they may not have been the most "slimming" choice. (My horizontal stripe marinières as an example, have become wardrobe favorites though they break that particular rule. And there are often ways to style certain pieces to make them more flattering. Inside Out Style is a wealth of information on how to make certain pieces or styles work best for different body types.)
It's fine to have a Style PD, as long as it's a conscious choice and a true expression of who we are today. I love finding garments that not only express my style but are flattering as well. But it shouldn't feel like a prison sentence, or prohibit experimentation with new and different looks. Especially as we go through life's passages, our identities and needs change. At some point we may decide that dressing primarily to try to look young or rich or classic just doesn't express who we are anymore.
These days, my Style Prime Directive is to dress joyfully. The manifestation of that may change from day to day, but the elements of joyful dressing for me are Movement, Color (not necessarily *vivid* color), Harmony, and just a bit of Edge. Maybe I'm just kidding myself, but I think that the resultant look is more flattering when I feel *good* in what I'm wearing. Confidence, bien dans sa peau, call it what you will, it's a powerful force.
These days, my Style Prime Directive is to dress joyfully. The manifestation of that may change from day to day, but the elements of joyful dressing for me are Movement, Color (not necessarily *vivid* color), Harmony, and just a bit of Edge. Maybe I'm just kidding myself, but I think that the resultant look is more flattering when I feel *good* in what I'm wearing. Confidence, bien dans sa peau, call it what you will, it's a powerful force.
Do you have a Style Prime Directive? Has it shifted over the years? Do you feel it's still working for you?
~
Labels:
Style,
Waxing Philosophical
| Reactions: |
Sunday, July 22, 2012
Happiness Is...
Friday, July 20, 2012
Une femme recommends: Nordstrom Anniversary Sale
![]() |
| NYDJ Marilyn Stretch Twill Jeans (Petite) |
![]() |
| Eileen Fisher Merino Wool Zip Cardigan |
![]() |
| Eileen Fisher slim ponte knit pants |
![]() |
| Cole Haan leather jacket (Petite) |
![]() |
| NYDJ Jade Leggings |
And speaking of boots...
![]() |
| Frye Melissa Trapunto boots |
![]() |
| Cole Haan Jodphur boot |
![]() |
| Sam Edelman bootie |
![]() |
| Alexis Bittar Tartan bracelets |
Have you shopped the sale? Find anything amazing?
~
Labels:
Boots,
Jackets,
Les Bijoux,
Pants,
Shopping
| Reactions: |
Thursday, July 19, 2012
Sky and Sale
![]() |
| Click to enlarge to better see the colors |
This pretty cloud and color play was going on when I arrived at Dodger Stadium yesterday. It must have been a good omen for the Dodgers, as they pulled it out with Matt Kemp's home run in the bottom of the 12th.
Check back tomorrow as I'll be posting my Nordstrom Anniversary Sale picks...
~
Wednesday, July 18, 2012
In The Ballpark...
It's that time of year again, and this afternoon I'll be attending a work function at baseball game with my boss' boss and the executive team. These types of work events always seem to flummox me when it comes to attire. (I rarely am called upon to attend any business social functions outside the office.) The guys just wear their usual chinos-button-shirt-and-loafers Business Casual uniform; my own BC ensembles don't feel right for a baseball stadium. I came up with a version of this ensemble a couple of years ago, and will probably go with it again today.
Do you have to attend outside functions as part of your job that require different attire than what you'd normally wear to work? How do you plan for it?
~
| Reactions: |
Tuesday, July 17, 2012
Retro
| Love that crazy Instagram! |
Yes, I've gone over to The Dark Side. After years (decades, really) of being disappointed by the lackluster brews of electric drip machines, tired of the fuss of single cup cone brewers, frustrated by the French press (the coffee is always lukewarm by the time I reach for my second cup) I've committed Coffee Snob Heresy and picked up a percolator.
During our rushed weekday mornings, I'm happy enough with my quick-and-tasty Nespresso lungo's, but during the weekend I love to sit and relax with a cup or two before the boys get up.
Percolated coffee can easily go bitter, so remove the cup with the grounds once it's done brewing, and don't leave the coffee sitting with the heat on for too many hours, lest you wind up with something reminiscent of battery acid. It's also important to grind the beans to the percolator setting, a bit more coarse than what you'd use for a drip machine.
Are you a coffee drinker? What's your preferred method of preparation?
~
Monday, July 16, 2012
Today I'm In Paris...
Well, not really. But I'm guest posting over at A Femme d'un Certain Âge, which is the next best thing! And we're talking scarves...
~
Fashion Flash
FabOverFifty is hosting Fashion Flash this week. Fashion, Beauty, Fitness, Health...it's all covered!
~
Saturday, July 14, 2012
Bon Weekend!
Quatorze julliet is well underway in France. Tish posted some lovely pictures of the celebrations.
And if you've been following Aunt Snow's travels, she's now in London! I'll be reading her dispatches with interest, as we're planning a trip to Great Britain next year.
Yesterday afternoon I had oral surgery to extract the rest of my cracked molar, and get a bone graft to prepare for an implant. (I'm slowly becoming the Bionic Woman...) It was a fairly quick process, and painless. I've had extractions before and haven't found them to be traumatic, but the oral surgeon (who was quite a good-looking fellow) insisted that I was at three-martini level with the laughing gas before he'd start working. There was a bit of pain when the novocaine wore off, quickly dispatched by the elephant strength Motrin he prescribed. But now I'm on liquids only for the next 2-3 days, and cool liquids only today. This morning my jaw is a bit swollen and stiff, but not painful.
I'm also not supposed to use a straw or spit for three days. Geez, that's really going to cramp my style...
;-)
How's your weekend shaping up?
~
Labels:
Blogtastique,
Miscellaneous
| Reactions: |
Friday, July 13, 2012
Rise Of The Burgundian Empire
![]() |
| Source |
For the most part, I think this color trend translates well to accessories, and when you pair this color with classic designs, you'll have pieces that can span not only seasons but years.
![]() |
| Marc Jacobs |
![]() |
| Yves Saint Laurent |
![]() |
| Ralph Lauren (yes, these are women's) |
![]() |
| Lanvin |
![]() |
| Frye |
![]() |
| Miu Miu |
![]() |
| Vaneli |
![]() |
| Valentino |
![]() |
| Miu Miu (had to throw these in just for fun) |
![]() |
| Marc Jacobs |
![]() |
| J.Crew (color is a bit softer IRL than it looks here) |
![]() |
| Marc Jacobs (be still my beating heart...) |
![]() |
| Longchamp |
~
| Reactions: |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
















































